🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.